<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Stephen Williams | Theology and Ethics</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.theologyethics.com/author/stephenwilliams/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.theologyethics.com</link>
	<description>Resources and reflections on theology and ethics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 May 2018 07:20:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-GB</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>The Election of Grace: A Riddle Without Resolution? (Kantzer Lectures) (Stephen Williams, 2009)</title>
		<link>https://www.theologyethics.com/2018/04/24/the-election-of-grace-a-riddle-without-resolution-kantzer-lectures-stephen-williams-2009/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stephen Williams]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2018 19:01:46 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Online Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[00 Williams_Stephen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[01 audio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[02 intermediate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[04 audio playlist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[04 lecture series]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[05 election & predestination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[07 Henry Center]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.theologyethics.com/?p=23842</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Dr. Williams presented a series of six lectures on Karl Barth and election, with particular emphasis upon the pastoral function of the doctrine. Beginning with a discussion of the issues that arise in debates about election, Dr. Williams details Karl Barth’s view on the topic of election and the related topics of Christian perseverance and particular atonement, including an exposition of Romans 9-11. Dr. Williams then developed Barth’s single predestinarian view and addressed the doctrine of assurance in conversation with Barth’s own views. Taken together, the lectures applied fresh perspective to the views of Karl Barth on the election of grace.<br />
Lecture Series Outline</p>
<p>Lecture 1: The different ways of understanding God that surface in debates about election<br />
Lecture 2: A lecture on Barth on election integrated with Barth’s views on Mozart, Beethoven and Brahms<br />
Lecture 3: The question of election as a determination of destiny, specifically, the problem of perseverance<br />
Lecture 4: The question of election and particular atonement, working from the John Owen/McLeod Campbell debate<br />
Lecture 5: Election, regeneration and faith<br />
Lecture 6: An exposition of Romans 9-11 offering a positive proposal on election, prepared for in lectures 1-5</p>
<p><iframe width="100%" height="450" scrolling="no" frameborder="no" allow="autoplay" src="https://w.soundcloud.com/player/?url=https%3A//api.soundcloud.com/playlists/505312452&#038;color=%23ff5500&#038;auto_play=false&#038;hide_related=false&#038;show_comments=true&#038;show_user=true&#038;show_reposts=false&#038;show_teaser=true"></iframe></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.theologyethics.com/2018/04/24/the-election-of-grace-a-riddle-without-resolution-kantzer-lectures-stephen-williams-2009/">The Election of Grace: A Riddle Without Resolution? (Kantzer Lectures) (Stephen Williams, 2009)</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.theologyethics.com">Theology and Ethics</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Outline for ethics: a response to Oliver O&#8217;Donovan</title>
		<link>https://www.theologyethics.com/2013/12/14/outline-for-ethics-a-response-to-oliver-odonovan/</link>
					<comments>https://www.theologyethics.com/2013/12/14/outline-for-ethics-a-response-to-oliver-odonovan/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stephen Williams]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Dec 2013 11:20:09 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Online Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[01 document]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[05 ethics]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theologyethics.com/?p=3434</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Stephen N. Williams review article of O'Donovan's "Resurrection and Moral Order"</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.theologyethics.com/2013/12/14/outline-for-ethics-a-response-to-oliver-odonovan/">Outline for ethics: a response to Oliver O’Donovan</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.theologyethics.com">Theology and Ethics</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.theologyethics.com/2013/12/14/outline-for-ethics-a-response-to-oliver-odonovan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
