04 Letter | Theology and Ethics https://www.theologyethics.com Resources and reflections on theology and ethics Wed, 14 Mar 2018 21:07:46 +0000 en-GB hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0 Paul Ramsey’s Style (Hauerwas, 2004) https://www.theologyethics.com/2016/04/25/paul-ramseys-style-first-things-augsept-2004-letter-at-end-of-page-hauerwas/ https://www.theologyethics.com/2016/04/25/paul-ramseys-style-first-things-augsept-2004-letter-at-end-of-page-hauerwas/#respond Mon, 25 Apr 2016 05:06:03 +0000 http://www.theologyethics.com/?p=6465 "I write in defense of Paul Ramsey. In “Editorial Secrets Revealed,” Richard John Neuhaus insists that Paul Ramsey was “a bad writer” (Public Square, April). Ramsey is not here to defend himself, so I must rise to the occasion".

The post Paul Ramsey’s Style (Hauerwas, 2004) first appeared on Theology and Ethics.

]]> https://www.theologyethics.com/2016/04/25/paul-ramseys-style-first-things-augsept-2004-letter-at-end-of-page-hauerwas/feed/ 0 An Open Letter to Revs. Adam Hamilton & Mike Slaughter (Abraham, 2014) https://www.theologyethics.com/2016/04/23/an-open-letter-to-revs-adam-hamilton-mike-slaughter-abraham-2014/ https://www.theologyethics.com/2016/04/23/an-open-letter-to-revs-adam-hamilton-mike-slaughter-abraham-2014/#respond Sat, 23 Apr 2016 18:30:18 +0000 http://www.theologyethics.com/?p=6106 A response to a proposal for the UMC to allow diversity in relation to homosexuality

The post An Open Letter to Revs. Adam Hamilton & Mike Slaughter (Abraham, 2014) first appeared on Theology and Ethics.

]]> https://www.theologyethics.com/2016/04/23/an-open-letter-to-revs-adam-hamilton-mike-slaughter-abraham-2014/feed/ 0 Letter of response to friends in the aftermath of the Vatican Instruction of 29 November 2005 (Alison, 2005) https://www.theologyethics.com/2014/03/14/letter-of-response-to-friends-in-the-aftermath-of-the-vatican-instruction-of-29-november-2005-alison-2005/ https://www.theologyethics.com/2014/03/14/letter-of-response-to-friends-in-the-aftermath-of-the-vatican-instruction-of-29-november-2005-alison-2005/#respond Fri, 14 Mar 2014 17:03:11 +0000 http://www.theologyethics.com/?p=4702 Now here is the crucial point: it is from this premise of the free-standing second teaching concerning the objective disorder of what you and I call being gay that everything else in this document flows. And yet that teaching is here presented in the most muted form I have seen it in a recent Roman document. It is almost as if some of the many higher authorities which have reviewed this document before allowing this particular dicastery to publish it might be saying something rather like this:

The post Letter of response to friends in the aftermath of the Vatican Instruction of 29 November 2005 (Alison, 2005) first appeared on Theology and Ethics.

]]> https://www.theologyethics.com/2014/03/14/letter-of-response-to-friends-in-the-aftermath-of-the-vatican-instruction-of-29-november-2005-alison-2005/feed/ 0 Response to “A Common Word Between Us and You” (Ford, 2007) https://www.theologyethics.com/2014/03/06/response-to-a-common-word-between-us-and-you-ford-2007/ https://www.theologyethics.com/2014/03/06/response-to-a-common-word-between-us-and-you-ford-2007/#respond Thu, 06 Mar 2014 15:33:59 +0000 http://www.theologyethics.com/?p=4554 This historic statement gives the right keynote for relations between Muslims and Christians in the 21st century. It is what we have been missing since 9/11/2001. The most impressive list of signatories from all the main Muslim traditions and countries have made a clear and powerful proclamation of love for God and for all neighbours. The message is rich and deep, and it goes to the heart of Muslim faith as expressed in the Quran. It also goes to the heart of the teaching of Jesus in the New Testament.

The post Response to “A Common Word Between Us and You” (Ford, 2007) first appeared on Theology and Ethics.

]]> https://www.theologyethics.com/2014/03/06/response-to-a-common-word-between-us-and-you-ford-2007/feed/ 0