<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>00 Cavanaugh 2ndry | Theology and Ethics</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.theologyethics.com/tag/cavanaugh/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.theologyethics.com</link>
	<description>Resources and reflections on theology and ethics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2018 21:04:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-GB</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Political church and the profane state in John Milbank and William Cavanaugh by Richard Davis (2013)</title>
		<link>https://www.theologyethics.com/2014/03/05/political-church-and-the-profane-state-in-john-milbank-and-william-cavanaugh-by-richard-davis-2013/</link>
					<comments>https://www.theologyethics.com/2014/03/05/political-church-and-the-profane-state-in-john-milbank-and-william-cavanaugh-by-richard-davis-2013/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guest Author]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2014 15:47:09 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Online Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[00 Cavanaugh 2ndry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[00 Cavanaugh_William]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[00 Milbank 2ndry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[04 thesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[05 political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[05 state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[07 Edinburgh University]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theologyethics.com/?p=4473</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>This thesis argues that the state is neither sacred nor profane, but if accepted as mundane, it is something that can be freely engaged with by the church as part of its overall witness to politics and society. In order to outline and assess the political theology of Milbank and Cavanaugh three biblical and doctrinal lenses - creation, preservation and redemption - are used to judge their work.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.theologyethics.com/2014/03/05/political-church-and-the-profane-state-in-john-milbank-and-william-cavanaugh-by-richard-davis-2013/">Political church and the profane state in John Milbank and William Cavanaugh by Richard Davis (2013)</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.theologyethics.com">Theology and Ethics</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.theologyethics.com/2014/03/05/political-church-and-the-profane-state-in-john-milbank-and-william-cavanaugh-by-richard-davis-2013/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
