<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>05 medical ethics | Theology and Ethics</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.theologyethics.com/tag/medical/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.theologyethics.com</link>
	<description>Resources and reflections on theology and ethics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2018 10:44:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-GB</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>A Case Against Permitting Intentional Medical Killing (Biggar, 2009)</title>
		<link>https://www.theologyethics.com/2014/01/06/a-case-against-permitting-intentional-medical-killing-2009/</link>
					<comments>https://www.theologyethics.com/2014/01/06/a-case-against-permitting-intentional-medical-killing-2009/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nigel Biggar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jan 2014 21:19:07 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Online Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[00 Biggar_Nigel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[01 document]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[02 beginner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[04 article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[05 euthanasia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[05 medical ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[07 KLICE]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theologyethics.com/?p=3780</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>[embeddoc url="http://klice.co.uk/uploads/Ethics%20in%20Brief/Biggar%20v14.1%20pub.pdf" download="all" viewer="google"]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.theologyethics.com/2014/01/06/a-case-against-permitting-intentional-medical-killing-2009/">A Case Against Permitting Intentional Medical Killing (Biggar, 2009)</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.theologyethics.com">Theology and Ethics</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.theologyethics.com/2014/01/06/a-case-against-permitting-intentional-medical-killing-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Physician as Political Actor: Late Abortion and the Strictures of Liberal Moral Discourse (Brian Brock, 2006)</title>
		<link>https://www.theologyethics.com/2013/12/14/the-physician-as-political-actor-late-abortion-and-the-strictures-of-liberal-moral-discourse-2006/</link>
					<comments>https://www.theologyethics.com/2013/12/14/the-physician-as-political-actor-late-abortion-and-the-strictures-of-liberal-moral-discourse-2006/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Brock]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Dec 2013 18:44:39 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Online Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[00 Brock_Brian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[01 document]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[05 abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[05 medical ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[05 political]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theologyethics.com/?p=3485</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>By examining the range of factors pressing on medical professionals faced with a decision in a case of late-term abortion, it becomes apparent that the theological resources ruled out of bounds by the standard account can be<br />
considered an essential part of a truly liberating and properly supple moral account of medical decision-making. Close attention to the social, political and legal context of contemporary medicine reveals that the standard account of medical ethics, Principles of Biomedical Ethics by Beauchamp and Childress, despite its universalist aspirations, disempowers rather than empowers moral decision-making by medical professionals.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.theologyethics.com/2013/12/14/the-physician-as-political-actor-late-abortion-and-the-strictures-of-liberal-moral-discourse-2006/">The Physician as Political Actor: Late Abortion and the Strictures of Liberal Moral Discourse (Brian Brock, 2006)</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.theologyethics.com">Theology and Ethics</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.theologyethics.com/2013/12/14/the-physician-as-political-actor-late-abortion-and-the-strictures-of-liberal-moral-discourse-2006/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Utility, Prudence and Care: Three concepts at the heart of the practice of clinical medicine (O&#8217;Donovan, 2012)</title>
		<link>https://www.theologyethics.com/2013/12/14/utility-prudence-and-care/</link>
					<comments>https://www.theologyethics.com/2013/12/14/utility-prudence-and-care/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Oliver O'Donovan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Dec 2013 12:02:52 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Online Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[00 O'Donovan_Oliver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[01 video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[05 medical ethics]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theologyethics.com/?p=3448</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Kolvenbach Centre Lecture from Thursday, 15 November, 2012.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.theologyethics.com/2013/12/14/utility-prudence-and-care/">Utility, Prudence and Care: Three concepts at the heart of the practice of clinical medicine (O’Donovan, 2012)</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.theologyethics.com">Theology and Ethics</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.theologyethics.com/2013/12/14/utility-prudence-and-care/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Right To Health? (O&#8217;Donovan, 2010)</title>
		<link>https://www.theologyethics.com/2013/12/12/a-right-to-health/</link>
					<comments>https://www.theologyethics.com/2013/12/12/a-right-to-health/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Oliver O'Donovan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2013 20:59:41 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Online Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[00 O'Donovan_Oliver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[01 document]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[05 medical ethics]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theologyethics.com/?p=3360</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>If we refer to it as a slogan, that need not be in a pejorative sense.   It means simply that “the right to health” does useful duty as a shorthand reference.   A cluster of concerns are summed up compactly;  it gestures out towards a whole line of argument remaining to be traced.   If we discuss “the right to health” as a slogan, we do not discuss anything we are actually doing or proposing to do.   &#8230;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.theologyethics.com/2013/12/12/a-right-to-health/">A Right To Health? (O’Donovan, 2010)</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.theologyethics.com">Theology and Ethics</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.theologyethics.com/2013/12/12/a-right-to-health/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
