<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>05 state | Theology and Ethics</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.theologyethics.com/tag/state/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.theologyethics.com</link>
	<description>Resources and reflections on theology and ethics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2018 21:39:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-GB</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Worship as Public Legal Pedagogy: Interview with Joan Lockwood O&#8217;Donovan (Lockwood O&#8217;Donovan, 2016)</title>
		<link>https://www.theologyethics.com/2018/04/08/worship-as-public-legal-pedagogy-interview-with-joan-lockwood-odonovan-lockwood-odonovan-2016/</link>
					<comments>https://www.theologyethics.com/2018/04/08/worship-as-public-legal-pedagogy-interview-with-joan-lockwood-odonovan-lockwood-odonovan-2016/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joan Lockwood O'Donovan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2018 21:39:07 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Online Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[00 Lockwood_O'Donovan_Joan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[01 document]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[02 beginner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[04 interview transcript]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[05 law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[05 liturgy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[05 state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[07 Cardus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[08 Smith_James_KA]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.theologyethics.com/?p=23671</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>James K.A. Smith interview with Joan Lockwood O'Donovan in which she explains that the church's public proclamation reminds society of the law—and grace—that transcends the state</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.theologyethics.com/2018/04/08/worship-as-public-legal-pedagogy-interview-with-joan-lockwood-odonovan-lockwood-odonovan-2016/">Worship as Public Legal Pedagogy: Interview with Joan Lockwood O’Donovan (Lockwood O’Donovan, 2016)</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.theologyethics.com">Theology and Ethics</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.theologyethics.com/2018/04/08/worship-as-public-legal-pedagogy-interview-with-joan-lockwood-odonovan-lockwood-odonovan-2016/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Messianic Nation: A Christian Theological Critique of American Exceptionalism (Cavanaugh, 2005)</title>
		<link>https://www.theologyethics.com/2014/03/05/messianic-nation-a-christian-theological-critique-of-american-exceptionalism-cavanaugh-2005/</link>
					<comments>https://www.theologyethics.com/2014/03/05/messianic-nation-a-christian-theological-critique-of-american-exceptionalism-cavanaugh-2005/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[William Cavanaugh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2014 18:33:31 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Online Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[00 Cavanaugh_William]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[01 document]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[04 article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[05 nation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[05 state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theologyethics.com/?p=4430</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>I want to distinguish between two broad types of American exceptionalism, one with Judeo-Christian roots, and the other with its roots in the Enlightenment. There is of course much mixing of the two types, but they represent two quite distinct ways of approaching the question of exceptionalism. The first explicitly appeals to Christian theological concepts such as the election of Israel and God's providence. The second appeals to Enlightenment concepts concerning the universal applicability of the American value of freedom.... My basic argument is that when a direct, unmediated relationship is posited between America and a transcendent reality - either God or freedom - there is a danger that the state will be divinized.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.theologyethics.com/2014/03/05/messianic-nation-a-christian-theological-critique-of-american-exceptionalism-cavanaugh-2005/">Messianic Nation: A Christian Theological Critique of American Exceptionalism (Cavanaugh, 2005)</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.theologyethics.com">Theology and Ethics</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.theologyethics.com/2014/03/05/messianic-nation-a-christian-theological-critique-of-american-exceptionalism-cavanaugh-2005/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Killing for the Telephone Company: Why the Nation-State is Not the Keeper of the Common Good (Cavanaugh, 2004)</title>
		<link>https://www.theologyethics.com/2014/03/05/killing-for-the-telephone-company-why-the-nation-state-is-not-the-keeper-of-the-common-good-2004/</link>
					<comments>https://www.theologyethics.com/2014/03/05/killing-for-the-telephone-company-why-the-nation-state-is-not-the-keeper-of-the-common-good-2004/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[William Cavanaugh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2014 16:11:06 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Online Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[00 Cavanaugh_William]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[01 document]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[04 article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[05 state]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theologyethics.com/?p=4432</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In Christian social ethics the assumption is often made, with a minimum of examination, that the responsibility for promoting and protecting the common good falls to the state. In this essay I want to examine that assumption. All too often Christian social ethics begins from ahistorical and idealized assumptions about the state as protector and benefactor.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.theologyethics.com/2014/03/05/killing-for-the-telephone-company-why-the-nation-state-is-not-the-keeper-of-the-common-good-2004/">Killing for the Telephone Company: Why the Nation-State is Not the Keeper of the Common Good (Cavanaugh, 2004)</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.theologyethics.com">Theology and Ethics</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.theologyethics.com/2014/03/05/killing-for-the-telephone-company-why-the-nation-state-is-not-the-keeper-of-the-common-good-2004/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Political church and the profane state in John Milbank and William Cavanaugh by Richard Davis (2013)</title>
		<link>https://www.theologyethics.com/2014/03/05/political-church-and-the-profane-state-in-john-milbank-and-william-cavanaugh-by-richard-davis-2013/</link>
					<comments>https://www.theologyethics.com/2014/03/05/political-church-and-the-profane-state-in-john-milbank-and-william-cavanaugh-by-richard-davis-2013/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guest Author]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2014 15:47:09 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Online Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[00 Cavanaugh 2ndry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[00 Cavanaugh_William]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[00 Milbank 2ndry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[04 thesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[05 political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[05 state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[07 Edinburgh University]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theologyethics.com/?p=4473</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>This thesis argues that the state is neither sacred nor profane, but if accepted as mundane, it is something that can be freely engaged with by the church as part of its overall witness to politics and society. In order to outline and assess the political theology of Milbank and Cavanaugh three biblical and doctrinal lenses - creation, preservation and redemption - are used to judge their work.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.theologyethics.com/2014/03/05/political-church-and-the-profane-state-in-john-milbank-and-william-cavanaugh-by-richard-davis-2013/">Political church and the profane state in John Milbank and William Cavanaugh by Richard Davis (2013)</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.theologyethics.com">Theology and Ethics</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.theologyethics.com/2014/03/05/political-church-and-the-profane-state-in-john-milbank-and-william-cavanaugh-by-richard-davis-2013/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;A Fire Strong Enough to Consume the House&#8221;: Wars of Religion and the Rise of the State (Cavanaugh, 1995)</title>
		<link>https://www.theologyethics.com/2014/03/04/a-fire-strong-enough-to-consume-the-house-wars-of-religion-and-the-rise-of-the-state-1995/</link>
					<comments>https://www.theologyethics.com/2014/03/04/a-fire-strong-enough-to-consume-the-house-wars-of-religion-and-the-rise-of-the-state-1995/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[William Cavanaugh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2014 19:26:23 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Online Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[00 Cavanaugh_William]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[01 document]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[04 article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[05 nation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[05 political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[05 state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[05 violence]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theologyethics.com/?p=4438</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>My purpose in this essay will be to focus on the way revulsion to killing in the name of religion is used to legitimize the transfer of ultimate loyalty to the modern State. Specifically I will examine how the so-called "Wars of Religion" of sixteenth- and seventeenth-century Europe are evoked as the founding moment of modern liberalism by theorists such as John<br />
Rawls, Judith Shklar, and Jeffrey Stout.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.theologyethics.com/2014/03/04/a-fire-strong-enough-to-consume-the-house-wars-of-religion-and-the-rise-of-the-state-1995/">“A Fire Strong Enough to Consume the House”: Wars of Religion and the Rise of the State (Cavanaugh, 1995)</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.theologyethics.com">Theology and Ethics</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.theologyethics.com/2014/03/04/a-fire-strong-enough-to-consume-the-house-wars-of-religion-and-the-rise-of-the-state-1995/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cardinal Pell and the Theology of the Nation State (Cavanaugh, 2005)</title>
		<link>https://www.theologyethics.com/2014/03/04/cardinal-pell-and-the-theology-of-the-nation-state-2005/</link>
					<comments>https://www.theologyethics.com/2014/03/04/cardinal-pell-and-the-theology-of-the-nation-state-2005/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[William Cavanaugh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2014 19:16:49 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Online Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[00 Cavanaugh_William]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[01 document]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[04 interview transcript]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[05 nation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[05 political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[05 state]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theologyethics.com/?p=4455</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>How might a Christian envision the way the world ought to be and how humans ought to live in community. I guess if you take the biblical story, which I do with my very beginning students, and you look at the biblical story as a whole, it can be told as the story of primordial unity and then scattering and gathering again, salvation as a kind of gathering again into a harmony amongst humans and between humans and God. And so the way the story of the Fall in Genesis is told it encapsulates the whole thing: that there is this Creation that begins good and then through sin kind of falls apart and so on and then we are to be gathered back together.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.theologyethics.com/2014/03/04/cardinal-pell-and-the-theology-of-the-nation-state-2005/">Cardinal Pell and the Theology of the Nation State (Cavanaugh, 2005)</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.theologyethics.com">Theology and Ethics</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.theologyethics.com/2014/03/04/cardinal-pell-and-the-theology-of-the-nation-state-2005/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
