<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>07 Journal of Analytic Theology | Theology and Ethics</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.theologyethics.com/tag/07-journal-of-analytic-theology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.theologyethics.com</link>
	<description>Resources and reflections on theology and ethics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2018 21:12:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-GB</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>What Makes Theology Theological (Webster, 2015)</title>
		<link>https://www.theologyethics.com/2016/05/27/what-makes-theology-theological-webster-2015/</link>
					<comments>https://www.theologyethics.com/2016/05/27/what-makes-theology-theological-webster-2015/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Webster]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2016 11:11:30 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Online Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[00 Webster_John]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[01 document]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[02 intermediate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[04 article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[05 doctrine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[05 theological method]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[07 Journal of Analytic Theology]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theologyethics.com/?p=7358</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>An understanding of the nature of theology comprises an account of its object, its cognitive principles, its ends and its practitioners.  The object of theology is two-fold: principally God the Holy Trinity, and derivatively all things in relation to God.  God is considered first absolutely, then relatively; all other things are treated relative to God, under the aspect of creatureliness.  The objective cognitive principle of theology is God’s infinite knowledge, of which God communicates a &#8230;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.theologyethics.com/2016/05/27/what-makes-theology-theological-webster-2015/">What Makes Theology Theological (Webster, 2015)</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.theologyethics.com">Theology and Ethics</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.theologyethics.com/2016/05/27/what-makes-theology-theological-webster-2015/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vocation and Christian Doctrine: A Response to John Stackhouse (Crisp, 2014)</title>
		<link>https://www.theologyethics.com/2016/05/07/vocation-and-christian-doctrine-a-response-to-john-stackhouse-crisp-2014/</link>
					<comments>https://www.theologyethics.com/2016/05/07/vocation-and-christian-doctrine-a-response-to-john-stackhouse-crisp-2014/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Oliver Crisp]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 May 2016 08:21:08 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Online Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[00 Crisp_Oliver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[01 document]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[02 intermediate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[04 Book Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[05 philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[05 theological method]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[07 Journal of Analytic Theology]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theologyethics.com/?p=7013</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A response to Stackhouse's Need to Know: Vocation as the Heart of Christian Epistemology</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.theologyethics.com/2016/05/07/vocation-and-christian-doctrine-a-response-to-john-stackhouse-crisp-2014/">Vocation and Christian Doctrine: A Response to John Stackhouse (Crisp, 2014)</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.theologyethics.com">Theology and Ethics</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.theologyethics.com/2016/05/07/vocation-and-christian-doctrine-a-response-to-john-stackhouse-crisp-2014/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Turning Philosophical Water into Theological Wine (Abraham, 2013)</title>
		<link>https://www.theologyethics.com/2016/05/07/turning-philosophical-water-into-theological-wine-abraham-2013/</link>
					<comments>https://www.theologyethics.com/2016/05/07/turning-philosophical-water-into-theological-wine-abraham-2013/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[William Abraham]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 May 2016 08:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Online Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[00 Abraham_William]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[01 document]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[02 intermediate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[04 article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[05 philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[05 theological method]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[07 Journal of Analytic Theology]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theologyethics.com/?p=7011</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Abraham's article, Cortez' response and Abraham's reply on the project of analytic theology</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.theologyethics.com/2016/05/07/turning-philosophical-water-into-theological-wine-abraham-2013/">Turning Philosophical Water into Theological Wine (Abraham, 2013)</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.theologyethics.com">Theology and Ethics</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.theologyethics.com/2016/05/07/turning-philosophical-water-into-theological-wine-abraham-2013/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ontology, Missiology, and the Travail of Christian Doctrine: A Conversation with Kevin Hector’s Theology without Metaphysics (Vanhoozer, 2013)</title>
		<link>https://www.theologyethics.com/2016/05/07/ontology-missiology-and-the-travail-of-christian-doctrine-a-conversation-with-kevin-hectors-theology-without-metaphysics-vanhoozer-2013/</link>
					<comments>https://www.theologyethics.com/2016/05/07/ontology-missiology-and-the-travail-of-christian-doctrine-a-conversation-with-kevin-hectors-theology-without-metaphysics-vanhoozer-2013/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin Vanhoozer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 May 2016 08:10:02 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Online Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[00 Vanhoozer_Kevin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[01 document]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[02 advanced]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[04 Book Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[05 doctrine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[05 missiology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[05 philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[07 Journal of Analytic Theology]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theologyethics.com/?p=7009</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A Conversation with Kevin Hector’s Theology without Metaphysics</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.theologyethics.com/2016/05/07/ontology-missiology-and-the-travail-of-christian-doctrine-a-conversation-with-kevin-hectors-theology-without-metaphysics-vanhoozer-2013/">Ontology, Missiology, and the Travail of Christian Doctrine: A Conversation with Kevin Hector’s Theology without Metaphysics (Vanhoozer, 2013)</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.theologyethics.com">Theology and Ethics</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.theologyethics.com/2016/05/07/ontology-missiology-and-the-travail-of-christian-doctrine-a-conversation-with-kevin-hectors-theology-without-metaphysics-vanhoozer-2013/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ad Hector: Response to Kevin Hector’s Theology without Metaphysics (Crisp, 2013)</title>
		<link>https://www.theologyethics.com/2016/05/07/ad-hector-response-to-kevin-hectors-theology-without-metaphysics-crisp-2013/</link>
					<comments>https://www.theologyethics.com/2016/05/07/ad-hector-response-to-kevin-hectors-theology-without-metaphysics-crisp-2013/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Oliver Crisp]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 May 2016 08:05:06 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Online Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[00 Crisp_Oliver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[01 document]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[02 advanced]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[04 Book Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[05 philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[07 Journal of Analytic Theology]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theologyethics.com/?p=7007</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Response to Kevin Hector’s Theology without Metaphysics</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.theologyethics.com/2016/05/07/ad-hector-response-to-kevin-hectors-theology-without-metaphysics-crisp-2013/">Ad Hector: Response to Kevin Hector’s Theology without Metaphysics (Crisp, 2013)</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.theologyethics.com">Theology and Ethics</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.theologyethics.com/2016/05/07/ad-hector-response-to-kevin-hectors-theology-without-metaphysics-crisp-2013/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Ransom Enough? (Crisp, 2015)</title>
		<link>https://www.theologyethics.com/2016/05/07/is-ransom-enough-crisp-2015/</link>
					<comments>https://www.theologyethics.com/2016/05/07/is-ransom-enough-crisp-2015/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Oliver Crisp]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 May 2016 07:57:16 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Online Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[00 Crisp_Oliver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[01 document]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[02 intermediate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[04 article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[05 atonement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[07 Journal of Analytic Theology]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theologyethics.com/?p=7005</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In recent systematic theology versions of the Ransom account of the atonement have proliferated. Much of this work uses Gustav Aulén's Christus Victor as a point of departure. In this paper I first distinguish between models and theories of atonement. Then I discuss three recent theological perorations of the Ransom model as a prelude to setting out four interpretive strategies for understanding this view of atonement. I then offer some critical remarks on these strategies, concluding that the Ransom view as set forth here does not provide a complete model of atonement.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.theologyethics.com/2016/05/07/is-ransom-enough-crisp-2015/">Is Ransom Enough? (Crisp, 2015)</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.theologyethics.com">Theology and Ethics</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.theologyethics.com/2016/05/07/is-ransom-enough-crisp-2015/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
